<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sarah&#039;s Health &#38; Home Blog &#187; human rights. society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cranesforpeace.com/tag/human-rights-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cranesforpeace.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polygamy: Cannot be condemned</title>
		<link>http://www.cranesforpeace.com/polygamy-cannot-be-condemned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cranesforpeace.com/polygamy-cannot-be-condemned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights. society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oprah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cranesforpeace.com/polygamy-cannot-be-condemned/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Possibly, the authorities believe it? Polygamists could be the life style morality? Finally, who are we to judge? They want more women by the people. Is that strange? Many men in private you say they see certain advantages of the system. If Oprah polygamists in his mission, the women said they elected. And the election [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly, the authorities believe it? Polygamists could be the life style morality? Finally, who are we to judge? They want more women by the people. Is that strange? Many men in private you say they see certain advantages of the system. If Oprah polygamists in his mission, the women said they elected. And the election is not what is at stake here? Do they not have the right to have their own life? </p>
<p><span id="more-5"></span></p>
<p>If you keep the amount of individual rights, polygamy is not condemned. By definition, the rights of the individual model dissolves the individual of any kind or level of social judgement. If I want the drug to leave the school or a cleaning agent that is my business and my business only. In addition, a not dare me to say that is bad. In our &quot;lack of respect not me,&quot; &quot;self-awareness&quot; of culture, you can not judge whatever, but to judge. </p>
<p>Culturism determines where the values of individualism is not. Culturism we would like to ask: &quot;What if everything in the world of culture acted as you do it?&quot; If we Mormon polygamists the right to marry, they could be able to handle. They are, finally, a kind of code of honour, which they sign. But what if a pimp has decided to marry his harem? Soon we could to a culture, in the cases of abuse and the sale of the women a moral. </p>
<p>If you think that some kind of innate code of honour to end this community to ensure the reality! The cultural diversity, stable certain cultures that women quite badly. The machismo and the exploitation of women is a common standard. Culturism recognizes that the man can not run left is at least as likely, a center of ethics for access to adopt what the Puritains means a model community of saints. When you click on the creed of individualism does not think it&#8217;s heart, you can return to the results very ugly. It is sufficient to look at our schools. </p>
<p>The expansion of our &quot;if the whole world?&quot; Criticism that if all drugs, the school and were left by the Dirnen? Our economy is literally go in the pot. College would be an illusion for most. Even those who have a diploma collegiality not the principle of economic opportunities, the concrete possibilities of choice. Instead of a system of mutual advantage in an economy, contracts, the profit a person can only be the loss of another. In this world a success and would be tantamount brutal. But your power can only small gathering without much of the future. In such a world, a &quot;Life Today&quot; ethics would be the only one that corresponds to the reality. </p>
<p>Culturist thinking constitutes a basis for existence and moral condemnation of polygamy. We hold to our traditional values and our morals on the vision that we are making progress. If other cultures want to have polygamy they are welcome as follows. But culturism, as opposed to multiculturalism, notes that Western countries have a culture. The polygamy is not a part of it. All our laws, our contracts should be rewritten to us. Only a few of us would like to live in the world, the result if the whole world has the right to do what they wanted, without regard to the sustainability of Western culture. The polygamy is bad, because it violates our values and our pit credit rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cranesforpeace.com/polygamy-cannot-be-condemned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
